Kyle Leon Customized Fat Loss - What is more effective, aerobic high or moderate?

03/11/2013 21:27

Kyle Leon Customized Fat Loss-  The reason for this article is a recent discussion that took place at the forum [1] with the "eternal" question of what kind of aerobic exercise is better, aerobic type High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT, high intensity interval) or moderate intensity aerobic type (such as eg brisk walking or running loose)? also studied and discussed whether it is cost effective to do one with aerobic empty stomach or not.article source

Discussion sparked from an article by Alan Aragon, known for its high quality articles which are based entirely on published clinical studies literature. If you do not mind, I strongly recommend you read all of the articles in the forum of In this article we will summarize the main points of the article.

The Problem The man exercised when using fuels that can be derived from either carbohydrates or fat, either from the same muscle tissue (protein). Gyms often being mistaken impression that the faster one runs on the treadmill, the bike or the elliptical, the more fat you burn. Research has shown that the maximum percentage of fat burning is not made intensive aerobic, aerobic but made moderate.

Acthen The Jeukendrup and found that in intensity 63% VO2 max have the maximum use of fat as fuel, while the minimum use of fat (and correspondingly maximum use glycogen) was at 83% VO2 max [2]. We can easily elevate these tensions in our beats. Remove from the 205 half your age to find 100% of your pulse (ie there where you see the radishes upside down). example, if the age of the trainee is 30, so half is 15. Maximum pulse: 205-15 = 190 Pulse percentage for maximum fat burning and minimal use of glycogen (63%): 0.63 x 190 = 120 near Pulse for a minimum percentage of fat burning and maximum use glycogen (83%): 0.83 x 190 = near 160 Not used random word " percentage "because often people misread this point.